Railroaders place to shoot the shit.

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Transport Canada nixes oil by rail to Churchill Port
Uke


Cured

Status: Offline
Posts: 26926
Date:
Transport Canada nixes oil by rail to Churchill Port
Permalink  
 


OMNITRAX... Not a good outfit! They're philosophy is "We do what we want, any time we want, and screw everybody else!"

http://www.thompsoncitizen.net/article/20130917/THOMPSON0107/130919960/-1/THOMPSON/under-test/



-- Edited by Uke on Saturday 21st of September 2013 11:53:11 PM

__________________

Hmm. That address doesnt look right.
It looks like the link pointing here was faulty.

Gah. Your tab just crashed.

Uke


Cured

Status: Offline
Posts: 26926
Date:
Permalink  
 

 

 
Dozens of tanker cars similar to the model used for the train that crashed in Lac-Megantic, Que., are parked on Monday, July 16, on the train's line near Farnham, Que. The derailment means the MMA railway can't move the oil to its destination in Saint John, NB. (Les Perreaux/The Globe and Mail)

Manitoba pans Churchill oil port idea

 

The Manitoba government says a rail companys plans to start transporting oil across hundreds of kilometres of remote rail line built on permafrost is too risky to the environment and the safety of those who live in the north.

NDP Transportation Minister Steve Ashton said in light of the deadly train derailment in Lac-Mégantic, Que., earlier this year, Manitoba cant support the shipment of crude oil through its fragile northern environment to the port in Churchill.

More Related to this Story

Lac-Mégantic was a wakeup call for all Canadians, Mr. Ashton told The Canadian Press. If there were concerns before, there are 10 times the concerns now. We have to make sure there is not a precipitous move by Omnitrax or anyone else [toward] shipment in this area.

Omnitrax Canada, the company that operates the only rail line up to Churchill, on Hudson Bay, was planning a trial shipment of crude oil next month. The company hopes to eventually transport millions of litres of light sweet crude oil a year up to the community where it can be loaded onto tankers.

While Omnitrax says the plan is safe and will help create much-needed jobs in the north, environmentalists and First Nations worry it will jeopardize the livelihoods of aboriginal communities and pose a huge risk to wildlife. Churchill, known as the polar bear capital of the world, is an eco-tourism destination for polar bear, beluga whale and bird watching.

What are the risks if there is a derailment? What are the risks if there is a spill? Mr. Ashton asked. This is a highly sensitive area that goes from boreal forest through to the tundra. Its important, both for traditional use but for economic use as well. Churchill is a major tourist destination . So there is heightened concern.

The province has chipped in some money to help upgrade the rail line over the years and supports diversifying the shipments that go through Churchill, Mr. Ashton said. But Manitoba cant support any plan to ship oil through Churchill without further upgrades and complete transparency regarding the cargo carried by the trains.

Figures from the Transportation Safety Board of Canada show there have been 63 accidents on the Hudson Bay rail line between 2003 and 2012. All but 10 were derailments.

Our advice to Omnitrax would be, go back to the drawing board on this, Mr. Ashton said.

Although the rail line runs through Manitoba, the track is under federal jurisdiction, so Mr. Ashton said the province can do little to stop the shipment of oil. Transport Canada declined an interview request, but sent an e-mailed statement saying Omnitrax would be expected to comply with all federal regulations should it proceed with its plans.

Omnitrax president Merv Tweed, the former MP for the Brandon-Souris riding, said the idea of hauling oil by rail is new and it will take time for people to get used to the concept. The shipment of crude oil by rail is perfectly safe and the tracks dont require any additional upgrade, Mr. Tweed said.

When you arent aware of all the facts, its easy to misunderstand whats being attempted or what were trying to do, Mr. Tweed said in an interview. We have to make sure that they understand that we know what were doing and what were trying to do and that we will do it with all the environmental and safety issues dealt with as regulated.

The company has been holding consultations in the north to try to quell public skepticism and ease concerns about the plan. A trial shipment of oil slated for next month is on hold while the company continues these consultations, Mr. Tweed said.

Omnitrax is determined to expand the port of Churchill while bringing jobs and prosperity to northern Manitoba, he added.

We have to look at any and all ways of continuing to grow traffic through the port, Mr. Tweed said. The return on that is the fact that communities create jobs and opportunities and young people get to stay where they want to live and enjoy a living.

But First Nations, who still rely on the wilderness for their living, are concerned moving crude oil through their traditional territory will threaten their way of life.

Grand Chief Irvin Sinclair, with the Keewatin Tribal Council, said people still hunt and trap on the land. One derailment or spill is all it would take to destroy the livelihood of generations, Mr. Sinclair said.

There goes the wildlife, he said. There goes a way of life for everybody if something drastic happens. It would be devastating to the environment.



__________________

Hmm. That address doesnt look right.
It looks like the link pointing here was faulty.

Gah. Your tab just crashed.



Barely a pulse...

Status: Offline
Posts: 2827
Date:
Permalink  
 

Bumper crop this year and sources suggest the grain haul orders

will be more traffic than the Denver based Omnitrax owned HBR

can handle. Antiquated power in need of overhaul and pathetic

track conditions may potentially be rectified with the added revenue

from 10,000 carloads of crude oil revenue. But, not likely in 2013.



-- Edited by Thunderwagon5000 on Wednesday 25th of September 2013 03:24:06 AM

__________________

 This is how I roll.

 

 

 

Uke


Cured

Status: Offline
Posts: 26926
Date:
Permalink  
 

We've been yakkin' up this topic lately, "oil by rail," and the truth of the matter is that the main players, the big outfits are gonna move whatever the source hands to 'em, and they'll try ta move it! CN, CP, BNSF, UP, and to a lesser degree maybe KCS.

Back on the east coast CSX (New Jersey) will access refineries after interchanging with CN, or M&E who run into "refineryland"!

And IF they don't, or can't, they hand it off ta outfits like OMNITRAX, and other "short lines" that will. And we'll be watching another Lac Magnitec unfold, and we won't know where it'll happen next!



-- Edited by Uke on Wednesday 25th of September 2013 04:25:29 AM

__________________

Hmm. That address doesnt look right.
It looks like the link pointing here was faulty.

Gah. Your tab just crashed.

Uke


Cured

Status: Offline
Posts: 26926
Date:
Permalink  
 

Bite my tongue yet again:http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/feds+eyeing+oilbyrail+Prince+Rupert+same+quantity+Gateway/8944287/story.html

 

A spokesman for CN Rail told The Canadian Press in an email that "no specific crude-by-rail project to Prince Rupert (was) discussed" at the March meeting with Natural Resources Canada.

The company "does not disclose publicly its commercial discussions with customers," Mark Hallman said in the email.

"CN will continue to explore new opportunities to move crude oil safely and efficiently to markets," Hallman wrote.

"The company will consider concrete crude-by-rail proposals, including any specific project to move crude to Prince Rupert. However, there is no infrastructure in place at Prince Rupert to transfer crude oil from train tank cars to vessels."

How long will it take 'em ta convince 'Rupert, and the province of good jobs, and cash coming to everybody, including first nations, before it's a done deal? CN already reaches Prince Rupert, so logically...



-- Edited by Uke on Wednesday 25th of September 2013 04:38:40 AM

__________________

Hmm. That address doesnt look right.
It looks like the link pointing here was faulty.

Gah. Your tab just crashed.



Barely a pulse...

Status: Offline
Posts: 2827
Date:
Permalink  
 

Uke wrote:

Bite my tongue yet again:http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/feds+eyeing+oilbyrail+Prince+Rupert+same+quantity+Gateway/8944287/story.html

 

A spokesman for CN Rail told The Canadian Press in an email that "no specific crude-by-rail project to Prince Rupert (was) discussed" at the March meeting with Natural Resources Canada.

The company "does not disclose publicly its commercial discussions with customers," Mark Hallman said in the email.

"CN will continue to explore new opportunities to move crude oil safely and efficiently to markets," Hallman wrote.

"The company will consider concrete crude-by-rail proposals, including any specific project to move crude to Prince Rupert. However, there is no infrastructure in place at Prince Rupert to transfer crude oil from train tank cars to vessels."

How long will it take 'em ta convince 'Rupert, and the province of good jobs, and cash coming to everybody, including first nations, before it's a done deal? CN already reaches Prince Rupert, so logically...



-- Edited by Uke on Wednesday 25th of September 2013 04:38:40 AM


 I am not a regulator, politician. or transportation analyst, but I am going take an educated guess that it probably won't happen before the end of Sept. 2013 , anyway. But ya never know . Maybe eh. I certainly trust them as much as any  other North American rail carrier

Train derails near Landis, Sask.RCMP on scene of train derailment in Saskatchewan

Train derails in Saskatchewan

Emergency services were called to a derailed CN train leaking crude oil just west of Landis, Sask.

http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/cn-train-derails-near-landis-sask-resulting-in-oil-leak-1.1469993

nonono



-- Edited by Thunderwagon5000 on Thursday 26th of September 2013 01:25:06 AM

__________________

 This is how I roll.

 

 

 

Uke


Cured

Status: Offline
Posts: 26926
Date:
Permalink  
 

If the pics are of CN's main line across Canada, the damn ROW has serious needs... Perhaps more than one cause can be attributed. Broken wheel from over-stress (lack of inspection), piss poor track maintenance, weak(eaned) ballast.

While Canada attempts to play catch up shipping "oil-by-rail" to the US, you'll continue hearing/seeing this type of derailment. Sad but true, ain't it?

__________________

Hmm. That address doesnt look right.
It looks like the link pointing here was faulty.

Gah. Your tab just crashed.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!