Railroaders place to shoot the shit.

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Train conductor's discrimination suit derailed


500 - Internal Server Error

Status: Offline
Posts: 36515
Date:
Train conductor's discrimination suit derailed
Permalink  
 


Train conductor's discrimination suit derailed

December 4th, 2008
| by noahs |
Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly - Boston,MA

A transportation company did not break the law by firing a train conductor
after a derailment because he was unable to produce enough urine to permit
drug testing, the U.S. District Court ruled in a recent case.

Michael Bratton was hired as a conductor by CSX Transportation in 2002. He
was at the controls when a train went off the tracks in 2006.

Bratton suffers from Crohn's disease and, because of that condition, had to
undergo an ileostomy in 1994. Due to the surgery, he is unable to remove
waste from his body in the usual manner and typically urinates only twice in
a 24-hour period.

On the day of the derailment, when he arrived at work he was that no random
drug testing would be required, and so he emptied his bladder.

Several hours later, following the derailment, he was asked to provide a
urine sample so that it could be determined if drugs played a part in the
accident. When he was initially unable to do so, he was instructed to drink
fluids and did so over the course of three hours. At the end of that time,
however, he was still unable to produce enough urine for testing and was
fired for "refusal to test."

He filed suit, claiming that he was the victim of illegal handicap
discrimination because of his Crohn's disease.

But U.S. District Court Judge William G. Young disagreed, awarding the
employer summary judgment.

Young found, first, that Bratton had not presented evidence that similarly
situated employees had been treated differently than he was.

Young then went on to find that the employer's reason for firing Bratton - a
"refusal to test" amounting to insubordination - was not a mere pretext for
discrimination.

"Rather than supporting Bratton's claims," th e judge said, "the record
supports a conclusion that, in terminating Bratton, CSX acted in accordance
with Federal law and its own policies, and not in bad faith."

This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from
http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm


__________________

© Equal Opportunity Annoyer

Troll The Anti-Fast Freight Freddie

 

 

 

 



Upgraded Condition?

Status: Offline
Posts: 9214
Date:
Permalink  
 

Could he have asked for an alternate test (blood) because of his handicap?



__________________

 This is the official end of my post.  



Force Majeure

Status: Offline
Posts: 23407
Date:
Permalink  
 

A fucking travesty.

__________________

 I think LAMCo is done with the neo-nazi CSX rejects -- Pipes FC 8/5/23



Force Majeure

Status: Offline
Posts: 23407
Date:
Permalink  
 

Calvin wrote:

 

Could he have asked for an alternate test (blood) because of his handicap?

 




 No.



__________________

 I think LAMCo is done with the neo-nazi CSX rejects -- Pipes FC 8/5/23

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!