Railroaders place to shoot the shit.

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: One man remotes


500 - Internal Server Error

Status: Offline
Posts: 36515
Date:
One man remotes
Permalink  
 


Remote control pact creating UTU jobs
CHICAGO - Include Alternate Vice President and General Chairperson John Babler among UTU officers who neither promoted nor wanted remote control locomotives, but recognized that new technology cannot be stopped.

Now celebrate Babler for proving that UTU's bold vision to accept ownership, control and operation of remote control technology will prevent railroads from contracting out the work. In fact, Babler has negotiated a new remote control technology agreement with Union Pacific that will create more than two dozen new UTU jobs at a new UP intermodal terminal near Chicago.

Five years ago, when UP began planning a new massive Global III intermodal terminal at Rochelle, Ill., some 50 miles from Chicago, the carrier intended to sub-contract the road switching work to a non-union short line as it may do for a new facility. UP designed the new terminal, which will handle some 750,000 container and trailer lifts annually, around remote control yard operations.

After UP and other carriers signed a letter of intent last year offering remote control work to the UTU, Babler recognized an opportunity and began negotiating with UP to give the work to the UTU rather than a non-union shortline. UTU's ratification of the new contract sealed the deal.

"We didn't give any wage concessions to get the work," said Babler. "There is no race to the bottom in this agreement. In fact, the new jobs will pay around $235 a day just for showing up. There are no rules concessions and we won scheduled days off, protected by a guaranteed extra board," Babler said. Jobs shall be advertised and awarded to the senior Eastern 1 seniority district applicants. Successful applicants will be trained on remote control operations and assigned pending certification.

The UTU remote control agreement "gave us the competitive edge over a non-union short line," Babler said. Three new jobs will be created in early September and a total of 10 new jobs should be created for UTU members at Rochelle by October and the number should grow to 25 new positions within three years, he said.

"Contrary to statements coming from other organizations, remote control operations can and will produce new work opportunities for our members," Babler said.

"John Babler has shown what real leadership is about," said UTU International President Byron A. Boyd Jr. "He has taken new technology and made it an ally of the members he represents. He has protected and created new jobs. I salute him for a job well done."

 

August 27, 2002


__________________

© Equal Opportunity Annoyer

Troll The Anti-Fast Freight Freddie

 

 

 

 



500 - Internal Server Error

Status: Offline
Posts: 36515
Date:
Permalink  
 

UTU members in "driver's seat," Boyd says
RENO, Nev. - The United Transportation Union negotiating team has placed UTU members "in the driver's seat" to control their destiny, UTU International President Byron A. Boyd, Jr., told a membership meeting here June 10. "What your UTU has won for you is control, ownership and operation of the (remote control) technology - protection against losing your job or your income because of the new technology."

Boyd spoke to more than 750 members here at the first of three UTU regional meetings. Meetings also will be held in Washington, D.C., in July and in New Orleans in August. The issue most on the minds of Reno attendees was the tentative contract between the UTU and most of the nation's major railroads. UTU members will be asked to ratify that agreement in July.

A consequential component of the tentative agreement is control, ownership and operation of remote control technology. "The issue is not whether change is going to occur," Boyd said. "The issue is who is going to control the new technology, who is going to own the new technology and who is going to operate the new technology."

Boyd explained how the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (BLE) walked away from an ability to control technology in Canada and, as a result, lost thousands of jobs there to the UTU. Now, Boyd said, the BLE is hoping to take those jobs from UTU members in the U.S. "What your UTU has won for you is the ability to control your own destiny," Boyd said. The UTU agreement also offers protection to engineers, he noted.

"Your UTU national officers and negotiating committees have broken free of a failed tradition among other organizations that simply react to events," Boyd said. "Your UTU is shaping events by meeting challenges with vision, courage and leadership that are defining a new frontier in labor relations. We are the labor union for the 21st century."

The UTU's objectives, Boyd said, "are as clear as the history of the labor movement: more, now. That means a combination of wages, health care, job safety, employment protections and retirement benefits. When viewed as a package, UTU contracts give us the peace of mind in knowing we have a secure future for ourselves, our spouses and our children."

The UTU negotiating team spent much time explaining the proposed national agreement, which includes wage increases and elimination of entry rates in addition to UTU members controlling, owning and operating remote control devices. The agreement also puts UTU in the driver's seat with regard to health care.

The carriers, which are demanding increased cost sharing from other unions - and which already have won increased cost sharing from one major rail union - are taking a different tack with the UTU. The carriers agreed to a UTU demand for a status quo pending a study of alternative means of controlling soaring health-care costs.

That study will include plan redesign, cost containment, administrative changes and vendor review. Any agreement would be subject to member ratification. Should the matter go to binding arbitration, the arbitrator would be required to consider UTU study evidence. This separates UTU from the other rail unions, Boyd said.

"In every aspect of our lives, it is an inevitable fact that we must confront change," Boyd said. "Change occurs whether we are ready or not and whether we want it or not. Were our fathers and grandfathers successful in attempting to stop the introduction of diesel locomotives?" he asked rhetorically. "Many of you have first-hand experience in how we couldn't stop elimination of the caboose.

"Remote control is technological change," Boyd said. "From an Air Force base in Florida, U.S. servicemen use remote control to fly unmanned warplanes in Afghanistan. From an office in Jacksonville, CSXT dispatchers use remote control to open switches in Michigan. And, every day for the past decade in rail yards across Canada, our brothers and sisters have used remote control to switch freight cars.

"If change is inevitable - and it is - then we must devise a strategy to make change our ally and not our enemy," Boyd said. "Those who deny change are really condemning themselves to be controlled by it. They will lose in the short run as well as the long run. This is because history records that everyone who has resisted change has lost."

To read the text of President Boyd's Reno speech, click here.

June 10, 2002


__________________

© Equal Opportunity Annoyer

Troll The Anti-Fast Freight Freddie

 

 

 

 



500 - Internal Server Error

Status: Offline
Posts: 36515
Date:
Permalink  
 

Analysts say UTU deal expensive to railroads
NEW YORK, N.Y. -- Wall Street analysts are saying that the tentative agreement between the UTU and the nation's major railroads will be costlier than expected for the railroads.

"The carriers did not get as good a deal" as they did with the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes, Salomon Smith Barney analyst Scott Flower told Traffic World magazine.

"The UTU was fighting more from a position of strength," said Morgan Stanley analyst Jim Valentine. He said the contract contains an expensive "shift differential" for UTU members who operate remote control belt-packs. That shift differential alone will pay UTU members some $50 million annually, said Valentine, and sharply erode the $250 million in annual gross savings expected from remote control operations on U.S. railroads.

Valentine also said that the tentative agreement calls for higher general wage increases than contained in a tentative agreement reached two years ago that was not submitted to the UTU membership for ratification. Valentine also said the contract provides job protection for UTU-represented employees affected by remote control operations.

Details of the tentative contract will be presented to UTU officers and general chairpersons May 23. The contract will then be submitted to the UTU membership for a ratification vote.

 

May 13, 2002


__________________

© Equal Opportunity Annoyer

Troll The Anti-Fast Freight Freddie

 

 

 

 



500 - Internal Server Error

Status: Offline
Posts: 36515
Date:
Permalink  
 

UTU Officers Give Rail Pact Huge Thumbs-Up
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Overwhelming support for a tentative contract between the United Transportation Union and most of the nation's major railroads was voiced here May 23 by the union's international officers and general chairpersons following their first look at the document.

The proposal, which must be ratified by the UTU rank-and-file, would increase wages substantially by December 2004, eliminate a two-tier wage system, protect UTU members against job loss from implementation of remote control technology and require railroads to study alternative means of controlling soaring health-care costs.

The proposed contract affects primarily some 65,000 operating employees on Burlington Northern Santa Fe, CSX Transportation, Kansas City Southern, Norfolk Southern and Union Pacific.

"This is a superior economic agreement that delivers wage increases well in excess of inflation, guarantees that our members are not going to lose their jobs because of remote control technology and puts the UTU in the driver's seat with regard to health-care cost reform," said UTU International President Byron A. Boyd Jr. "This contract is about improving our members' standards of living and providing them with long-term survivability in a world where technology is replacing humans."

The complete agreement and ballot could be delivered to UTU members by early July. General chairpersons have until June 7 to submit questions regarding contract interpretation, which will be sent out to rail negotiators for a written response. The contract, questions and answers, a history of negotiations and other explanatory material then will be sent members eligible to vote. They will have 21 days in which to study the contract and cast a ballot.

"Even were one to uncouple the proposed tentative agreement from the remote control package, which provides additional pay and protection, what is left still would be far superior to anything else out there," Boyd said.

"This proposal gives us control over our destiny," said Assistant President Paul C. Thompson. He recalled that when computers first appeared in railroad yards, they were embraced rather than opposed by yardmasters. "Anytime new technology comes on the market, the workers who embrace that technology become the long-term survivor," said UTU Yardmasters Division Vice President Don Carver.

The contract briefing took place in the main hearing room of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, which was made available to the UTU for the entire day by the bi-partisan committee leadership. When House Railroad Subcommittee Chairman Jack Quinn (R-N.Y.) stopped by to check on progress, he said: "I try not to put my nose into others' business, but if you have an opportunity to work out this issue before it gets to us, you will be much better off."

Quinn echoed comments by UTU General Secretary and Treasurer Dan Johnson that if the agreement is not ratified and the Bush White House appoints a Presidential Emergency Board, the UTU is likely to be much worse off. "You are better off making decisions yourself," Quinn said. "If the issue comes before us for resolution, it won't get done to your liking because we can't control the politics."

Although the carriers sought more than a dozen work rule and other changes when negotiations began, the tentative contract contains none of those carrier proposals. "Each would be alive again -- such as the 160-mile day, combining of extra boards and elimination of the Federal Employers' Liability Act -- if this agreement is rejected and we wind up with a Presidential Emergency Board," Johnson said.

Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.), who also visited with the UTU officers May 23, later told UTU National Legislative Director James Brunkenhoefer that while he (Baucus) strives to protect the interests of organized labor, Congress would very likely give the UTU less if ratification fails and the White House acts to head off a work stoppage.

"There is a war going on and the nation is still in a recession," Brunkenhoefer said. "After the railroads tell Congress that a work stoppage could affect national security and that we are among the highest paid industrial workers in America, there is not going to be a lot of support for us on Capitol Hill even with all the friends we have. The staff that advises Congress pays several hundred dollars a month toward their health insurance. So there we would be, arguing for a status quo where we pay almost nothing toward health insurance."

UTU Vice President Arty Martin said that elimination of the dual basis of pay, which would scrap lower entry rates, combined with an the additional payment for operating remote control technology, could increase wages for many by $1,000 per month and allow many UTU employees now renting apartments to afford a home for their families.

"Evaluate this contract by the light of reality," Boyd said. "Remote control is not going away. So we must ask ourselves: Do we want this work? Do we want to decide our destiny? Or do we want to give the work to the BLE and let BLE negotiators decide our destiny?"

Here is a summary of the tentative contract:

-- General wage increases of 4 percent July 1, 2002; 2.5 percent July 1, 2003; and 3 percent July 1, 2004.

-- $1,200 longevity bonus paid all pre-1985 employees.

-- Alternative compensation programs, such as stock options, stock grants, bonus programs and 401(k) plans to be offered at carrier discretion and only implemented by mutual agreement with general committees.

-- All cost of living adjustments since July 1, 2000 ($3.84 per day) rolled into wages and subject to all general wage increases.

-- Status quo for health-care benefits and cost sharing pending study and negotiation concerning plan redesign, cost containment, cost sharing, administrative changes and vendor review. This separates UTU from the BMWE settlement and other rail unions. Any agreement reached after study is subject to ratification. Failing agreement, issues may go to arbitration, but UTU study and other materials may be used.

-- Trip rates established for through freight assignments. Full pay for deadhead trips, which will result in significant increases for pre-'85 employees. All post-'85 employees will be brought to parity.

-- Overtime not included as a pay element in trip rate calculations. Overtime will continue to be paid as it is.

-- Trip rates implemented within 30 months. If not, dual basis of pay for post'85 employees eliminated.

-- Effective July 1, 2004, employees subject to entry rates will receive the full rate of pay when working as a conductor/foreman, brakeman/helper hostler or engineer (on carriers party to agreement where UTU represents engineers).

-- Off-track vehicle accident benefits increased to $300,000 and aggregate benefit to $10 million. Maximum per week payment to an injured employee increased from $150 to $1,000.

-- All employees in train service or on a train-service seniority roster eligible for protection against adverse affects of remote control operations.

-- UTU represented engineers will be included in the protected class.

-- UTU will offer BLE protection for BLE-represented engineers.

-- Overview committee of UTU and carrier representatives to discuss and resolve problems associated with remote control technology.

-- Yardmasters receive same benefit package as basic agreement; longevity payment for pre-1987 employees; an increase in supplemental sickness; parity with operating crafts on vacation; and turnover time not to exceed 15 minutes at straight time rate when transitioning work responsibilities between shifts.

 

May 23, 2002


__________________

© Equal Opportunity Annoyer

Troll The Anti-Fast Freight Freddie

 

 

 

 



500 - Internal Server Error

Status: Offline
Posts: 36515
Date:
Permalink  
 

Straight talk on remote control
By Paul Thompson, International Assistant President

There are numerous false rumors about remote control. Let me set the record straight.

It begins in Canada a decade ago, when the carriers sought to negotiate remote control operations jointly with the UTU and the BLE. But, soon after negotiations began, the BLE declined to meet and talks broke down. That was unfortunate, because the UTU had proposed the two organizations work closely to put an emphasis on job protection for both train and engine service employees. After the BLE refused to negotiate, the issue was decided by a third-party arbitrator.

The separate UTU and BLE arbitration hearings were handled simultaneously. The UTU focus was on safety, mitigation of adverse affects and measures to protect jobs. The BLE's primary focus was who would "own" the work.

The arbitrator ruled that the work of a yard foreman would not change if the foreman, instead of giving hand signals to an engineer, sent signals via a belt pack to an on-board computer.

The ink was barely dry on this award when the carrier served notice to establish conditions for extensive use of belt packs. The carrier said if both the UTU and the BLE would jointly negotiate an all-inclusive belt-pack agreement, benefits would be superior. Again, the three parties met. And, again, the BLE walked out - this time refusing to sit with the UTU because of the arbitration award.

By letting a third party determine its fate, the BLE lost all of the yard engineer positions in Canada, and UTU-represented employees were given the remote control work.

When the UTU became aware that the U.S. carriers were considering remote control operations, President Boyd sought to avoid a repeat of the Canadian situation. He hoped a UTU-BLE merger would unite the two organizations to work solely for the benefit of all train and engine service employees. I know, because I was present when President Boyd explained this situation to then-BLE President Clarence Monin and later to then-BLE President Ed Dubroski.

Both Clarence and Ed agreed that all train and engine service employees would be better served by one organization working to protect all members.

When the U.S. carriers signed a letter of intent with the UTU regarding remote control operations, President Boyd immediately alerted newly elected BLE President Don Hahs. In fact, on President Hahs' first trip to Cleveland after his election, President Boyd brought me, General Secretary and Treasurer Dan Johnson and General Counsel Clint Miller to an Oct. 3 meeting with BLE President Hahs, First Vice President Ed Rodzwicz, General Secretary and Treasurer Bill Walpert and BLE General Counsel Harold Ross.

President Boyd showed the BLE officers the letter of intent. They discussed how a UTU-BLE merger would protect train and engine service jobs as U.S. carriers sought to implement remote control. President Boyd specifically promised President Hahs that the UTU would demand from the carriers a seat for the BLE at the negotiating table and equal job protections for all train and engine service workers.

President Boyd also told President Hahs that the UTU had cancelled all negotiations over remote control with the carriers until after the BLE voted on the merger. This would allow BLE officers to sit with the UTU at all remote control negotiating sessions. The BLE officers present at that meeting personally assured President Boyd they would openly support the merger.

The BLE officers did not openly support the merger. And, once it was voted down by the BLE members, the BLE walked down the same path it had walked in Canada. The BLE chose to fight remote control and not negotiate.

The BLE contended it was a "major" dispute and the BLE could engage in a work stoppage. A federal judge said, "no." The BLE was left to submit the issue to arbitration, the same as the BLE was forced to do in Canada, thus again giving a third party control over their members' destiny.

Meanwhile, the BLE is demanding all the remote control work. The BLE is not fighting to stop remote control. It is fighting to take the work from the UTU. The BLE has a history of taking work from train service employees in favor of engineers.

On Montana Rail Link, where the BLE represents train-service employees as well as engineers, the BLE on March 12, 2001, negotiated a remote control agreement that gives remote control operations to two engineers. When only two engineers are on an assignment without train-service employees, the two engineers receive an extra 45 minutes pay.

So if you wonder why the UTU negotiated this issue with the carriers, you need look only at recorded history.

You might also ask why the UTU didn't simply fight remote control technology. The answer is that we have repeatedly learned - in Canada with remote control and in the U.S. with radios and end-of-train devices - that technology cannot be stopped. Moreover, the U.S. carriers have the Canadian arbitration award on their side, which says belt packs are simply communication devices. They further argue that they have a right to unilaterally implement remote control.

While the UTU believes the carriers do not have the right unilaterally to implement, we know from experience that we are better off negotiating rather than having a third party, whether it be an arbitrator, court or Congress, make decisions for us - especially since most of those third-party decisions have not been good ones for our members.

I think we have negotiated solid and valuable protections for UTU members in the tentative agreement you will see shortly. In fact, the tentative agreement provides substantial protections for buy-outs and/or reserve board positions for engineers as well as train service employees. President Boyd is to be commended for looking out for all operating employees.

It is too bad BLE officers do not share a similar desire.

May 16, 2002


Attachments
__________________

© Equal Opportunity Annoyer

Troll The Anti-Fast Freight Freddie

 

 

 

 



Upgraded Condition?

Status: Offline
Posts: 9214
Date:
Permalink  
 

UTU NEWS
Volume 31April 1999Number 4

UTU NEWS ONLINE EDITION
APRIL 1999
PROGRESS THROUGH UNITY

A Service of the United Transportation Union
Public Relations Department

Charles L. Little
International President
Roger D. Griffeth
International General Secretary & Treasurer

Editorial Offices:
UTU NEWS
14600 Detroit Ave.
Cleveland, OH 44107-4250
UTU@compuserve.com
http://www.utu.org

TABLE OF CONTENTS

IN THIS EDITION

 

EDITORIALS

The moon, the stars, and a cold day ..............##M

 

 

The moon, the stars, and a cold day ..............##M

A recent article in Railway Age titled "Locomotive Remote Control" extolling the marvels and virtues of beltpack technology in Canada has some tongues wagging. The article's author, Luther Miller, has bought into the myth that beltpacks are an invention as important to railroads as sliced bread was to peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.

The writer quotes an unnamed senior U.S. railroad officer saying the railroads don't want to "antagonize the unions" and others (FRA, Congress) right now by trying to push these dangerous gadgets into service south of the 49th parallel. The officer says, "This is a big one, but the moon and stars aren't aligned right now to suggest that we would have any probability of success."

We think he should also throw in a cold day in... you know where.Beltpacks are dangerous and are a leading cause of death on the railroad and at steel mills. The unification of the UTU and BLE will help prevent beltpacks from endangering workers and taking jobs away from both locomotive engineers and conductors. No longer will the carriers be able to play one union off against the other on this subject. Those who think otherwise are misguided and shortsighted.

We believe in at least two-person crews, for safety and other strong reasons, from now well into the future. The new union will protect locomotive engineers and conductors equally from this misguided technological device. For that to change, the moon, the stars, a cold day in...and Jupiter will all have to be in alignment.



-- Edited by Calvin on Friday 17th of April 2009 08:05:30 AM

__________________

 This is the official end of my post.  

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!