Railroaders place to shoot the shit.

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: No compelling evidence? Really Nancy...
Uke


Cured

Status: Offline
Posts: 26926
Date:
No compelling evidence? Really Nancy...
Permalink  
 


Okay. Let's give you the benefit of the doubt, cuz you're more familiar with the Constitutional questions on this prez than most of us, but open yer eyes fer chrissakes!

 

Pelosi says without compelling evidence, she opposes Trump impeachment

 

 

 

Published: Mar 11, 2019 4:32 p.m. ET

 Pelosi says Trump isnt worth impeachi

 

By

RobertSchroeder

White House reporter
MarketWatch photo illustration/Getty Images
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, right, says shes not for impeachment even though she doesnt believe President Trump is fit for office.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has suggested shes not eager to impeach President Donald Trump but on Monday she put it bluntly, saying shes not for impeachment.

Impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless theres something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I dont think we should go down that path, because it divides the country. And hes just not worth it. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi

Californias Pelosi spoke to the Washington Post and answered a question about removing Trump from office, a call made by some of her fellow Democrats.

 

Pelosi in recent weeks has called impeachment a divisive issue, and used that same word when ruling it out.

 

Democrats including Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib have been supportive of impeaching Trump, though Ocasio-Cortez said las week she would casio-cortez-on-impeachment-of-trump-i-defer-to-the-party-leadership">defer to party leadership.

 

While Pelosi may not be for removing Trump, she did say she doesnt believe hes fit to be president.

 

Pelosi isnt the only high-profile Democrat to back away from impeachment. Former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid last spring said his party would be better off the less it talked about impeachment.

 

Her remarks come ahead of what is expected to be the imminent release of a report from Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who has examined whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia in the run-up to the 2016 campaign.

 

 



-- Edited by Uke on Tuesday 12th of March 2019 12:28:49 PM

__________________

Hmm. That address doesnt look right.
It looks like the link pointing here was faulty.

Gah. Your tab just crashed.



Force Majeure

Status: Offline
Posts: 23396
Date:
SuperMadministrator Can't Recognize The Game
Permalink  
 


Untitled.jpg



__________________

Tinhorn Dictator



Unstable & Irrational

Status: Offline
Posts: 10777
Date:
No compelling evidence? Really Nancy...
Permalink  
 


I agree with Nancy, still continue with the committee investigations... Seems like a lot of these people end up in prison for lying to Congress, so.... lets give them the opportunity...

__________________

I started ophph with nuthin, and I can safely say I have most of it left....
<img

Uke


Cured

Status: Offline
Posts: 26926
Date:
Permalink  
 

Okay, okay... Let's step back a few steps and give Don... The fat slob a chance to have his say on the 'report'

That report would be the Mueller results from the investigation over Russia and its, or their ties to Trump.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/15/trump-tweets-there-should-be-no-robert-mueller-russia-probe-report.html

From all we learned Donald is not happy at the possibility of the public knowing what Mueller has learned from all this.

Too bad Donnie. You may not like it, but we demand the report, and ALL the facts that has been revealed by Mueller's crew.

 



__________________

Hmm. That address doesnt look right.
It looks like the link pointing here was faulty.

Gah. Your tab just crashed.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!