Railroaders place to shoot the shit.

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: FELA doesn't apply to SEPTA


500 - Internal Server Error

Status: Offline
Posts: 36511
Date:
FELA doesn't apply to SEPTA
Permalink  
 


UTU to respond to SEPTA FELA attack

PHILADELPHIA The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority has unilaterally informed the UTU and other railroad labor organizations that, in its legal counsel's position, the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA) does not apply to SEPTA.

 

SEPTA asserted in a Jan. 15 letter to its labor organizations that any future "work-related injury that a member of your union (or any other employee assigned to the Railroad Division) sustains, SEPTA will continue to offer to that employee benefits under Pennsylvanias Workers Compensation Act."

 

SEPTA added, "As in the past, an injured employee in the Railroad Division must complete an injury-on-duty report and give it to his/her supervisor."

 

SEPTA's unilateral decision to dodge FELA coverage is based on its interpretation of a recent local court decision that the publicly owned SEPTA shares with the State of Pennsylvania, "sovereign immunity," and thus must provide permission to be sued.

The UTU Legal Department advises that there is contrary precedent at the state court and federal court levels.

January 16, 2009


__________________

© Equal Opportunity Annoyer

Troll The Anti-Fast Freight Freddie

 

 

 

 



500 - Internal Server Error

Status: Offline
Posts: 36511
Date:
Permalink  
 

Carrier attack on FELA challenged

PHILADELPHIA - The UTU and other rail labor organizations have gone to federal court here to obtain an order halting the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) from unilaterally reneging on its responsibilities to injured workers under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA).

A federal district court here was told by the labor organizations Jan. 16 that the SEPTA is in violation of three separate federal statutes, and cannot unilaterally abandon its responsibilities under the FELA.

On Jan. 15, the SEPTA informed the UTU and other rail labor organizations that, in its opinion, the FELA does not apply to that interstate commuter railroad. The SEPTA assertion is based on a local court decision.

The SEPTA asserts that under that local court decision, the SEPTA shares with the State of Pennsylvania, "sovereign immunity," and thus must provide permission to be sued.

As such, the SEPTA says it chooses not to be sued, under provisions of the FELA, by employees injured on the job; but rather the SEPTA will process workplace injury claims under the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act. Such benefits are far inferior to those available under the FELA.

In pursing injunctive relief -- a federal court order halting the SEPTA from abandoning its responsibilities under the FELA -- the rail labor organizations point to the SEPTAs obligations under the FELA, the recently enacted Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, and the Railway Labor Act.

The labor organizations told the court that:

* Section 51 of the FELA provides that "Every common carrier by railroad while engaging in commerce between any of the several States ... shall be liable in damages to any person suffering injury ... or death ... while he is employed by such carrier in commerce ... resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier, or by reason of any defect or insufficiency, due to its negligence ..."

* Section 55 of the FELA provides that "Any contract, rule, regulation, or device whatsoever, the purpose or intent of which shall be to enable any common carrier to exempt itself from any liability created by [the FELA], shall to that extent be void."

* Section 20109 of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 provides that a rail carrier "may not deny, delay or interfere with the medical or first aid treatment of an employee who is injured during the course of employment." Yet, the Pennsylvania workers' compensation laws provide that an employee injured on the job must be treated by a doctor of the employers rather than the employees choosing. This would violate the SEPTA's obligations under the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008.

* The Railway Labor Act requires that a carrier wishing to alter the established rates of pay, rules or working conditions must serve notice to that effect and collectively bargain over the proposed changes, and not unilaterally alter a collective bargaining agreement. In fact, the labor organizations' collective bargaining agreements with the SEPTA recognize the right of SEPTA employees to pursue claims under the FELA. Thus, by unilaterally asserting that its contract employees will no longer be covered by the FELA, the SEPTA has changed the collective bargaining agreements without first exhausting the bargaining procedures under the Railway Labor Act.

The labor organizations asked the federal district court to find the SEPTA in violation of the FELA, the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 and the Railway Labor Act.

Additionally, the labor organizations asked the court to grant a preliminary and permanent injunction requiring the SEPTA to "cease and desist from its unlawful conduct;" to honor its obligations under the FELA, the Rail Safety Improvement Act and the Railway Labor Act; to restore and maintain the status quo as it existed prior to the SEPTA's unlawful actions; and to refrain from taking any action to change its collective bargaining agreements without the unions consent or until the carrier has exhausted the major dispute procedures of the Railway Labor Act.

January 17, 2009


__________________

© Equal Opportunity Annoyer

Troll The Anti-Fast Freight Freddie

 

 

 

 



500 - Internal Server Error

Status: Offline
Posts: 36511
Date:
Permalink  
 

BLET leads fight to halt SEPTA attack on FELA

CLEVELAND, January 16 In response to a claim by the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) that the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) does not apply to its commuter rail workers, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen and other unions on the property today filed suit seeking to halt SEPTAs attempts to force affected workers on the job to submit to medical treatment from the agencys Workers Compensation department.

SEPTA took this position in a January 15 letter to the General Chairmen for the various crafts in its Railroad Division, stating that FELA "does not apply to SEPTA," and that injured commuter rail workers would be handled "under Pennsylvanias Workers Compensation Act."

The suit was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, alleging that SEPTAs action violates (1) the FELA, (2) the section of last years Rail Safety Improvement Act prohibiting interference in a treatment plan developed by a worker and his/her treating physician, and (3) the Railway Labor Act.

Commenting on the situation, National President Ed Rodzwicz said, "SEPTA has taken an outrageous and untenable position. The case theyre relying on is contradicted by every other case that has decided this issue and is incapable of being applied in an across-the-board manner, as SEPTA suggests.

"We will not allow SEPTA to interfere in the medical treatment of our members who are injured on the job, or to deprive our Brothers and Sisters of their rights under the FELA," Rodzwicz added. "SEPTAs action would fully justify our withdrawal from service, but we decided that doing so would have cast an unfortunate and unnecessary pall over the pre-Inaugural activities in Philadelphia this weekend."

Additional developments will be reported as they occur.

Friday, January 16, 2009
bentley@ble.org



__________________

© Equal Opportunity Annoyer

Troll The Anti-Fast Freight Freddie

 

 

 

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!