Railroaders place to shoot the shit.

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: CN, Chicago-area community coalition issue court briefs in EJ&E appeal


500 - Internal Server Error

Status: Offline
Posts: 36516
Date:
CN, Chicago-area community coalition issue court briefs in EJ&E appeal
Permalink  
 


CN, Chicago-area community coalition issue court briefs in EJ&E appeal

(The following appeared on the Progressive Railroading website on April 13, 2010.)

Last week, CN and The Regional Answer to Canadian National (TRAC) filed opening briefs with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that outline their arguments for an appeal regarding the Surface Transportation Board's (STB) approval of the Class Is acquisition of the Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway (EJ&E) last year.

Both parties are appealing portions of the boards decision on different grounds. CN is asking the court to strike from the STBs decision the requirement that the railroad partially fund grade separations in Aurora and Lynwood, Ill., which the Class I estimates will cost more than $65 million.

CN officials believe the STB only had the authority to approve the transaction and could only impose mitigation measures that guide the Class I in adopting voluntary mitigation agreements with communities. Anything beyond voluntary mitigation requirements is unlawful and should be overturned by the court, CN officials claim in their brief.

Meanwhile, TRAC is basing its appeal on what it claims are four errors made by the STB during the transaction review process. The coalition of Chicago-area communities opposed to CNs takeover of the EJ&E believes the STB:

unquestioningly adopted the railroads purpose of and need for the transaction;
impermissibly restricted an analysis of alternatives;
enabled CN to avoid financial responsibility for grade separations in Aurora and Lynwood if construction is delayed beyond 2015 by factors that cant be controlled by communities and state agencies; and
erred throughout the environmental review process, such as by failing to select and supervise a third-party contractor to handle the process, and consider the transactions direct, indirect and cumulative effects, TRAC officials claim in a prepared statement.

We realize that we are facing an uphill battle to prevail in the court, but we believe that we have made an excellent case that the court will consider, said TRAC Co-Chairman and Barrington Village President Karen Darch. TRAC has no choice but to pursue the legal challenge given the severity of the impacts on the region."

Wednesday, April 14, 2010



__________________

© Equal Opportunity Annoyer

Troll The Anti-Fast Freight Freddie

 

 

 

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!