Railroaders place to shoot the shit.

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Ho-ho-uh-oh...
Uke


Cured

Status: Offline
Posts: 12540
Date:
Ho-ho-uh-oh...
Permalink  
 


Christmas Day. Not for everybody. Not for Uncle Pete, and his legal team. Nope!

http://tinyurl.com/j3qltbo



__________________

Hmm. That address doesnt look right.
It looks like the link pointing here was faulty.

Gah. Your tab just crashed.



Force Majeure

Status: Online
Posts: 13401
Date:
Permalink  
 

***, could you sum it up for us. Your lynx doesn't work. Maybe Tr0LL can edit it for you?

Merry Christmas!

__________________

Never Going Back!

Uke


Cured

Status: Offline
Posts: 12540
Date:
Permalink  
 

 

PORTLAND The wife of one of two people killed when a freight train struck an SUV at a rural crossing seeks $2.7 million in a wrongful death lawsuit against Union Pacific and several workers.

The suit filed Wednesday alleges that there were safety hazards at the spot where the collision occurred, and the railroad company failed to address them.


The crash happened Dec. 10, 2013, as Nicholas, Kalla and MacKenzie Conway were driving to breakfast on an icy, snowy road after herding cattle in Klamath County. A northbound freight train struck the vehicle at a marked railroad crossing west of Highway 97. The crossing did not have guardrails or lights.

Nicholas Conway, the driver and lone survivor, initially was charged with criminally negligent homicide in the deaths of the passengers his wife, Kalla, and his brother, MacKenzie. A prosecutor dismissed the charges three months ago, saying in a court document the state could not prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

Conways defense attorney, Mike Arnold, said after the dismissal that his client never saw the train coming, and was neither speeding nor trying to beat the train.

MacKenzie Conway, the front-seat passenger, was survived by his wife and three stepchildren. The lawsuit was filed in Portland on their behalf.

The lawsuit alleges that Union Pacific has control over the steepness of the grade from the access road to the crossing, the location and angles of passive warning devices, the location of sight-obscuring vegetation and the installation of active warning devices.

It says Union Pacific failed to either recognize or take steps to eliminate local safety hazards and warn others of their existence.

Accordingly, the crew on the train ... did nothing to slow the train, prepare to slow the train, sound an audible warning device before it was too late.

BTW, yes it's Kersmuss, so 'they' say... But the virgin birth thing, and Babby Jeezuss, and all that, *** does not buy!

As to tRoll fixing the previous lync, phukk TroLl!



__________________

Hmm. That address doesnt look right.
It looks like the link pointing here was faulty.

Gah. Your tab just crashed.



500 - Internal Server Error

Status: Offline
Posts: 14583
Date:
Permalink  
 

Uke wrote:

Christmas Day. Not for everybody. Not for Uncle Pete, and his legal team. Nope!

http://tinyurl.com/j3qltbo


 



__________________

© Equal Opportunity Annoyer

Troll The Anti-Fast Freight Freddie

 

 

 

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!