Railroaders place to shoot the shit.

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: New technology for old locomotives: Bio-coal could revive steam engines


Force Majeure

Status: Offline
Posts: 13401
Date:
New technology for old locomotives: Bio-coal could revive steam engines
Permalink  
 


atsf3463-3.jpg 

New technology for old locomotives: Bio-coal could revive steam engines




 
 
19/10/2012

A 75-year old Santa Fe locomotive sits in a Topeka, Kan., park waiting to take a ride to Minneapolis where it will be fixed up with digital technology and new engineering in an effort to revive steam engine rail transportation.

A key aim of the effort is using carbon-neutral bio-coal being developed by the University of Minnesota-Duluths Natural Resources Research Institute (NRRI). The Coalition for Sustainable Rail, a subsidiary of Sustainable Rail International, is raising money between $3 million and $5 million to update the steam locomotive, said Davidson Ward, 24, president of the non-profit.

We have a technology we are confident will outperform the existing technology not only with performance and maintenance costs but also with emissions, he said. Its a paradigm-changing project.

Dubbed Project 130 to reflect the desire to develop a locomotive that reaches 130 miles per hour, the sustainable rail effort began as a single track idea a revival of steam locomotion.

Then, another track was added when Ward approached the University of Minnesotas Institute on the Environment. The institutes staff liked the idea and thought bio-coal UMD had been developing might work in the steam locomotive.

The environment institutes special projects director, Rod Larkins, said he became convinced that Project 130 was a good idea after learning it could serve as a combined heat and power application of the kind used at District Energy in St. Paul. The technology that could revive steam engine trains could be applied to bring energy to underserved areas of the world.

What youre doing is creating a combined heat and power unit that not only moves you up and down the tracks but if you park your train at the end of the line in a small village in Africa you have a way to heat and light a village at night, he said. If you take the wheels off and ship these things around the world you have small scale heat and combined power.

One ingredient to the success of the sustainable train is the development of bio-coal that involves a process known as torrefaction, according to UMDs Center for Applied Research and Technology Development director Donald Fosnacht.   Wood, grasses, corn stovers and other plants are subjected to extremely high temperatures during torrefaction that densifies them into a product that is the equivalent of coal albeit a much cleaner and cheaper version.

Bio-coal doesnt have mercury and its low in sulfur, so you get all those beneficial things, said Fosnacht. Theres no doubt we can be competitive with diesel on a cost basis and well have less containments.

The bio-coal created from wood and other waste can produce the same amount of energy as western coal from Wyoming and the Dakotas that is used by many Minnesota utilities, said Fosnacht. The interest in bio-coal, he figures, could extend beyond steam trains to energy companies looking to avoid expensive upgrades in coal-based power plants yet use a cleaner power source.

When you convert to a torrified material its like what youre using so you dont have to do upfront changes, he said. Another benefit might come in a revival of the forestry industry, hit hard by paper mill closures and reduced demand, Fosnacht added.

For now, though, the sustainable train will be the focus of the bio-coal. In addition to being a cleaner option than diesel, the steam engine train will have twice the power and use fuel half the cost of diesel, Ward said.

Steam trains fueled by coal largely disappeared by the end of the 1950s, he said. Even then, many cities were concerned about air pollution from locomotives. The rail industry moved to diesel-engine locomotives, said Ward, which remain dominant today.

The federal government wants to create a passenger rail network where trains travel at least 110 to 125 miles per hour, said Ward, similar to speeds that steam locomotives reached back in the 1930s.   If the sustainable rail coalitions locomotive, the Santa Fe 3463, can reach the goal of 130 miles per hour it will set an international record for steam engines.

Ward gathered a few colleagues with ties to the railroad industry to start Sustainable Rail International in 2011 in collaboration with the U of Ms Institute on the Environment . His partners include Washington, D.C.-based rail consultant John T. Rhodes, local rail expert G. Rob Mangels and Argentina-based engineer Shaun T. McMahon.

Wards day job is as a transportation analyst at R.L. Banks & Associates in Arlington, Va. Now living in the Washington, D.C. area, he keeps one foot in Minnesota while submitting applications to foundations, the University of Minnesota and others to bolster funding and get the train moved to Minneapolis.

An anonymous donor offered an initial grant that the group used to cosmetically refurnish the Topeka train, create a website and pay for other startup costs. Theres plenty of interest in the project, especially among rail enthusiasts and technologists, though another important group has begun to take interest.

Ive talked to multiple railroad industry leaders about the project and theyre interested but they want to see what happens, he said. They want to see that it works.

© 2012 Dolan Media Newswires. All Rights Reserved.


Copyright 2012 Dolan Media Newswires


-- Edited by Snippy on Friday 26th of October 2012 12:26:10 AM

__________________

Never Going Back!



Upgraded Condition?

Status: Offline
Posts: 5180
Date:
Permalink  
 

These idiots need ta talk to Ross Rowland about the ACE 3000.



__________________

 This is the official end of my post.  



500 - Internal Server Error

Status: Offline
Posts: 14583
Date:
Permalink  
 

trip optimizer

__________________

© Equal Opportunity Annoyer

Troll The Anti-Fast Freight Freddie

 

 

 

 



Unstable & Irrational

Status: Offline
Posts: 4835
Date:
Permalink  
 

Uke would have to be pulled out oph retirement to maintain the thing.

__________________

I started ophph with nuthin, and I can safely say I have most of it left....
<img

wes


Stable

Status: Offline
Posts: 140
Date:
Permalink  
 

Even Uke couldn't save this one.

To do anything with steam would require more than a face-lift to an old engine.

Total B. S. 

 



__________________


Upgraded Condition?

Status: Offline
Posts: 5180
Date:
Permalink  
 

Just the work on the siderods and cylinders.

Nothing is simpler than a magnetic connection....ie traction motor.

Why dont they make steam to turn a turbine that spins an electrical generator?



__________________

 This is the official end of my post.  

Uke


Cured

Status: Offline
Posts: 12540
Date:
Permalink  
 

That's already been done... And found ta be less efficient than your usual reciprocating steamer! The more railroads, and science, and business collaborate...the more hare brained the solutions, and technology become!

The absolutely best, most efficient diesel engine built is only 40% efficient. That's burning the best, cleanest fuel available. The generator/alternator can only produce as much power (useful/useable) as the prime mover (diesel) produces. Already at a loss...

Through switching the current for traction is about 30% of the power of the fuel burned in the engine... By the time the current reaches the rails ta spin the damn wheels...it's down another 6-7%...

So your locomotive gets about 22% of the fuel burned in efficiency when moving tonnage from point A, ta point B. The make up? The fuel consumed once that tonnage is moving at track speed, less fuel is consumed, than what was used to move the load from a dead stop in the first place.

The railroads have the numbers ta prove this. If ever science, technology, and business reinvent the wheel (essentially what 'they're proposing ta do with steam), I doubt any of this will fly.

Lovely sentiment though it may be... Saving/salvaging an old gal from the scrappers torch is a noble, if frivolous pursuit. And if they've got the money ta spend...

__________________

Hmm. That address doesnt look right.
It looks like the link pointing here was faulty.

Gah. Your tab just crashed.

Uke


Cured

Status: Offline
Posts: 12540
Date:
Permalink  
 

Not true. I love to experiment, and play with technology. Compressing 'waste' bio-mass inta useable fuel expends more energy, hence the return must be extremely efficient. Far above the original 40% efficiency achieved by the most efficient diesel engine.

By the time these guys get going, they'll have spent more'n $3-mill just workin' with their fuels. The locomotive restoration? Damn labor intense... And the army required ta maintain it... The railroads have already been there, and done that...More men to employ, and pay benefits for... They're not about ta go there again!

Nice try gang!



-- Edited by Uke on Friday 26th of October 2012 07:48:11 PM

__________________

Hmm. That address doesnt look right.
It looks like the link pointing here was faulty.

Gah. Your tab just crashed.



Unstable & Irrational

Status: Offline
Posts: 4835
Date:
Permalink  
 

Well, I am all for it, to experiment with. Just seems to be alot of mechanical parts moving. Perhaps with newer engineered materials and such,, they can improve it????

__________________

I started ophph with nuthin, and I can safely say I have most of it left....
<img

Uke


Cured

Status: Offline
Posts: 12540
Date:
Permalink  
 

All the money in the world can't eliminate friction, and frictional losses. Recaptured heat...cogeneration, using the old tech 'super-heater' idea, might save a few cents on the dollar. But the big picture?

Very, very obscure. Ya can't ignore the facts, and reinventing the wheel is what this is... I'm all for restoration, and saving steam locomotives, but reality is reality. Numbers don't lie.

__________________

Hmm. That address doesnt look right.
It looks like the link pointing here was faulty.

Gah. Your tab just crashed.



Unstable & Irrational

Status: Offline
Posts: 4835
Date:
Permalink  
 

Uke, vice president of the Flat Earth Society. Doesn't want to experiment.

__________________

I started ophph with nuthin, and I can safely say I have most of it left....
<img

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!